Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace-Liam Nana Sam Ankrah
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ace-Liam Nana Sam Ankrah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is idiotic... This is an article about a one-year old who has been declared the youngest male artist by Guinness because, like any child, he can randomly put paint on a canvas. It seems pretty clear that there will never be sustained coverage of him. Pichpich (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Ghana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Well, there are a grand total of two news articles in Yen News about the child; we don't hold Guinness Records as notable, so I'm not sure what's left for notability... A child that draws pictures is what every child, everywhere on the planet, does. I don't see notability, at all. Oaktree b (talk) 01:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Perhaps a merge to Guinness World Records as a brief mention somewhere but other than that, no, Wikipedia does hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves. -- Ϫ 09:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm guessing you meant to write: "no, Wikipedia does NOT hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves"? Pichpich (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes thank you for correcting my error. -- Ϫ 12:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm guessing you meant to write: "no, Wikipedia does NOT hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves"? Pichpich (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. No need to merge to Guinness World Records as this is extremely minor based on very few sources over just a short period of time. Elspea756 (talk) 12:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This GWR is usually not a criteria for being notable except at a great case like Hilda Baci, Lata Tondon, etc. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.